\subsection{Reflection of the modeling process}
\begin{center}
	\emph{This applies to section 23-27.}
\end{center}
Our model is still far from perfect. If we had more time to work on this assignment, we would try to implement the determination of the winner, such that after 30 minutes, the lowest bid would be chosen as the fulfiller. This would make the model more capable of showing more flaws in the original system.\\
\\
The main purpose of our model is verification. The criteria relevant for the purpose verification are in this case, scalability, convincingness and impact. 
\begin{itemize}
	\item[-] {\bf Scalability} Our model can be used on a range of different scales for modeled systems. In our case we have a scale of approximately 8500 orders a day. It is easy to change the size of the model without affecting the outcomes or usability of said model. The scalability of our model is not an area in which we seek improvement. 
	\item[-] {\bf Convincingness} Our model could be made slightly more convincing by using real quantities and estimates of Floral Direct. In our model we used statistics provided by Rabobank and CBS. Using these figures we assumed a 40\% marketshare and a partner size of 40\% of all florists in the Netherlands. These quantities are quite optimistic but are most likely not so high in reality. This would’t have affected our model, rather the severity of the problem. \\
	Using these figures nonetheless anticipated problems which may occur using a bigger scale. 
	\item[-] {\bf Impact:} The impact of our model also depends partly on the assumptions we made. Using a larger scale implies more errors during the ordering process, which can lead to a loss of lower bids and eventually lower profits. The impact of our model depends on the scale we use. Using existing numbers would minimise the impact or at least gave a better estimation of the profit loss.
\end{itemize}
We are very proud of the model we created. CPN tools is a pretty complicated program, so we are proud of this working model. We have made the model timed, and we implemented a new (better) lock system. \\
During this project we have learned how to analyze malfunctioning systems, how to make conceptual and Entity-Relationship models, how to use CPN tools and how to work on documentation together using \LaTeX\ and subversion (SVN).